This is funny and may become true.
http://www.slate.com/id/2112318/fr/nl/
This is funny and may become true.
http://www.slate.com/id/2112318/fr/nl/
Sorry but I can’t resist harping on this one.
Venture Beat and Boomtown reported that Ning Raised $15M for total valuation of $750M. This kind of news seems to make everyone all twittery (sorry, could not resist again) especially in the Valley. What does it mean? Only that Marc Andreesen is the master at pumping up valuations and finding some sucker to buy them.
Even if you believe Ning’s numbers and that 200,000 private social networks are active, how many are actually willing to shell out for premium service? I would venture a guess of 1-5%. Even if we assume 10% that is 20,000 willing customers at $25 pop (this price is from their blog), that is 500K per month. Let’s not forget that they also make money selling ads. Assuming they can make $.20 per user* on 6 million users (again their number), they would take in another 1.2M /month, for a total of 1.7M/ month or approximately $20 M per year.
As for expenses, I am not privy to their numbers but I can guess that between employees and servers, they are probably losing money at least as much as the revenue stream.
So to recap the math, $750M for a company that makes $20M a year (using generous assumptions) with little prospects of turning a profit. Do I hear “Bubble 2.0” popping?
*Raj Kapoor (Managing Director at Sillicon Valley’s Mayfield Fund) estimates that social network sites make $.20 month per user on ad sales (source: http://www.undertheradarblog.com/blog/social-networks-will-make-more-money-off-site-vs-on/).
This is a post I starting writing on Feb 25, and then got pulled off on to other pressing matters and just put the finishing touches on it. When I started writing it, the Dow was 7270 on its way down to 6500 territory. My outlook has not really changed.
With all of the doom and gloom about the economy, I am becoming more optimistic. Not, cautiously optimistic, but plainly optimistic. This stems from the fact that most pundits and economists are looking backwards because that is the only data they have. They were clearly wrong on the way down and now they are wrong again.
[Those of us in the real world, talking to real people, who have jobs a wide variety of jobs got a sense of the economy long before the statistics show it. I could tell, though not quantify that we were in a recession a year ago. I believe that it stems from our being in touch with everyday middle class people: small business owners, mechanics, plumbers, electricians, etc. It seems pretty apparent to me that the majority of decision makers in Washington, Wall Street types and the pundits on TV live in a social circle where economic hardship rarely occurs. As a result, they really cannot put a familiar face on a person that is losing their house or has to go to the food pantry to feed their family. Perhaps that is why they were surprised at the outrage over the AIG bonuses.]
Anyway, I think that we are at the bottom and that biggest issue right now is fear and lack of consumer confidence (primarily employment related – everyone is fearful for their job). A combination of the stimulus package with some stability / reversal in the jobs numbers will turn things around. I believe that the speed of the recovery will surprise the experts. This is because the experts need to be more cautious now; stimulus spending on construction will boost jobs quickly as the companies start hiring, and there is pent up demand for many goods and services.
You should not miss it, it has some priceless lines in it.
The press seems to be ganging up on Mark Zuckerberg for his apparent inability to articulate how he is going to monetize his phenomenal asset (see the WSJ Article: Facebook Tries to Woo Marketers
The jobs report came out today showing 240,000 jobs were lost last month, the unemployment rate is now 6.5%, its highest level in 14 years. This is very serious and the news will likely get worse before it gets better.
My criticism of the government and pundits is that they are out of touch with real people and are looking in the rearview mirror on economic data. Those of us in the real world have seen the faltering economy for over a year and have seen the effect of the credit crisis, loss of jobs and the fear of a job loss.
Rick Santelli of CNBC is one of the few pundits that seems to understand the problem and the real solution he said that “any money injected into the system has to be about jobs”. I agree whole heartedly, all the problems with credit and liquidity will pale in comparison to the issues we will face if unemployment continues its steep climb.
The good news is that I believe that Barack Obama understands this and will make smart choices. I only hope that the lame duck administration lets the incoming administration to influence policy immediately because waiting or doing nothing is not a viable option.
(As a side note, I find it interesting that the current administration was very quick to bail out the financial institutions but slow or non-responsive towards other industries – specifically autos. If GM goes bankrupt, the impact on the economy will be devastating – and I would predict far worse than the credit crunch. It is not like we have never bailed out private companies and industries before: airlines, Chrysler and recently the wall street titans. History has shown that providing loan guarantees will not transform us into a socialist economy.)
I just finished a 7 page write up on my thoughts what 2009 will bring for the ESN market.
Here is an outline and some excerpts. If you would like to get a full copy, email me at david at dinesconsulting.com and I will send you a PDF.
Current Market Landscape
Vendor Landscape
Venture Capital and Investments
Emerging Technologies (Micro-blogging, mobile, geo, and social spreadsheets)
Conclusions
Excerpt:
CURRENT MARKET LANDSCAPE
There will be a major sales and marketing battle among all the vendors for marquee accounts in the Global 1000. The next 12 months will be important for more than just bragging rights – vendors that cannot obtain prominent reference accounts and reach a certain critical mass may be left behind.
Until recently, the ESN market has been growing rapidly (our research shows high growth, approximately 100%) and we expect healthy (30-40%) long-term growth. However, we have been seeing signs that the overall economic malaise is starting to affect the ESN market. Many companies are delaying new initiatives as they determine the impact of the global slowdown. As a result, we expect enterprise decision makers will require stronger business cases / higher ROI before approving ESN projects.